Back to Search Start Over

BioMonitor 2 in-office setting insertion safety and feasibility evaluation with device functionality assessment: results from the prospective cohort BioInsight study.

Authors :
Awad, Khaled
Weiss, Raul
Yunus, Asim
Bittrick, Jon M.
Nekkanti, Rajasekhar
Houmsse, Mahmoud
Okabe, Toshimasa
Adamson, Teagan
Miller, Crystal
Alawwa, Abdul K.
Source :
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders; 4/15/2020, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p1-7, 7p, 1 Illustration, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Insertable cardiac monitors are utilized for the diagnosis of arrhythmias and traditionally have been inserted within hospitals. Recent code updates allow for reimbursement of office-based insertions; however, there is limited information regarding the resources and processes required to support in-office insertions. We sought to determine the safety and feasibility of in-office insertion of the BioMonitor 2 and better understand in-office procedures, including patient selection, pre-insertion protocols, resource availability, and staff support.<bold>Methods: </bold>Patients meeting an indication for a rhythm monitor were prospectively enrolled into this single-arm, non-randomized trial. All patients underwent insertion in an office setting. Two follow-up visits at days 7 and 90 were required. Information on adverse events, device performance, office site preparations, and resource utilization were collected.<bold>Results: </bold>Eighty-two patients were enrolled at six sites. Insertion was successful in all 77 patients with an attempt. Oral anticoagulation was stopped in 20.8% of patients and continued through insertion in 23.4%, while prophylactic antibiotics were infrequently utilized (37.7% of study participants). On average, the procedure required a surgeon plus two support staff and 35 min in an office room to complete the 8.4 min insertion procedure. The mean R-wave amplitude was 0.77 mV at insertion and 0.67 mV at 90-days with low noise burden (2.7%). There were no procedure related complications. Two adverse events were reported (event rate 2.7% [95% CI 0.3, 9.5%]).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In-office insertion of the BioMonitor 2 is safe and feasible. Devices performed well with high R-wave amplitudes and low noise burden. These results further support shifting cardiac monitor insertions to office-based locations.<bold>Trial Registration: </bold>clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02756338. Registered 29 April 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712261
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
142737659
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01439-8