Back to Search
Start Over
Flexural strength of minimum thickness ceramic veneers manufactured with different techniques.
- Source :
- Quintessence International; Apr2020, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p268-273, 6p, 1 Black and White Photograph, 3 Diagrams, 1 Chart
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- The objective of the present study was to assess the effect of monolithic and bilayer restorations considering heat-pressed and milled/CAD/CAM reinforced lithium disilicate ceramic veneers, on the flexural strength after cementation. Method and materials: Thirty-five specimens were divided into five groups (n = 7), according to the restorative solution: 2-mm thickness composite resin (CR2); heat-pressed monolithic ceramic 0.6 mm (HPM), CAD/CAM monolithic ceramics 0.6 mm (CCM); heat-pressed monolithic ceramic 0.4 mm + 0.2 mm glass-ceramic (HPB); CAD/CAM monolithic ceramic 0.4 mm + 0.2 glass-ceramic (CCB). Specimens were cemented on composite resin bars and submitted to a threepoint bending test on a Universal Testing Machine, until fracture. Fractured samples were analyzed under stereomicroscope and SEM. Flexural strength data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Results: The control group showed the highest flexural strength results (119.57 ± 19.49 MPa), with values similar to groups HPM (98 ± 25.62 MPa) and CCM (96.14 ± 20.60 MPa). Groups HPB and CCB showed lower values when compared with the other groups. Fracture started from the base on monolithic groups and from ceramic on bilayer groups. Conclusion: Both ceramic systems (CAD/ CAM and heat-pressed) have similar fracture strength, although bilayer restorations present lower strength when compared with monolithic ceramics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00336572
- Volume :
- 51
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Quintessence International
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 142300981
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a44147