Back to Search
Start Over
The Outcomes of Switching from Short- to Long-Term Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implant Therapy in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema.
- Source :
- Ophthalmic Research; 2020, Vol. 63 Issue 2, p114-121, 8p
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: First-line treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) is usually with antivascular endothelial growth factor agents, followed by intravitreal corticosteroids as a second-line treatment option. Long-term corticosteroids may offer quality of life and effectiveness benefits over short-term implants. Objectives: To evaluate outcomes of patients with persistent or recurrent DME who switched from a short-term (dexamethasone) to a long-term (fluocinolone acetonide, FAc) corticosteroid intravitreal implant in a real-world setting. Methods: This is a retrospective study in 9 Portuguese centers. An FAc intravitreal implant was administered according to product labeling. Effectiveness outcomes were mean change in visual acuity (VA; ETDRS letters), central retinal thickness (CRT; µm), and macular volume (MV; mm<superscript>3</superscript>). The safety outcome was mean change in intraocular pressure (IOP; mm Hg). All were analyzed at months 1 and 3, and then quarterly until month 24 after implantation. Results: Forty-four eyes from 36 patients were analyzed. Mean duration of DME was 3.3 ± 1.9 years, and mean follow-up was 8 months. From baseline following FAc implantation, VA increased significantly at months 1 and 6 (mean +6.82 and +13.02 letters, respectively; p = 0.005), and last observation carried forward (LOCF; mean +8.3 letters; p = 0.002). CRT improved significantly at months 1 and 6 (mean –71.81 and –170.77 µm, respectively; p = 0.001), and LOCF (mean –121.46 µm; p = 0.001). MV was consistently, but not significantly, decreased from baseline to LOCF (mean –0.69 mm<superscript>3</superscript>; p = 0.062). The mean change in IOP was –0.25 and +0.88 mm Hg at months 1 and 6, respectively (p = 0.268), and +1.86 mm Hg at LOCF (p = 0.036). Increases were controlled with topical medication in most cases. Conclusions: The FAc intravitreal implant is effective in patients previously treated with short-term corticosteroid implants. Thus, after a suboptimal response to antiangiogenics or a short-term corticosteroid, a single FAc implant may be considered an effective and tolerable treatment that can improve long-term outcomes for patients with sight-threatening DME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00303747
- Volume :
- 63
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Ophthalmic Research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 142083530
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000503036