Back to Search Start Over

The Outcomes of Switching from Short- to Long-Term Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implant Therapy in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema.

Authors :
Vaz-Pereira, Sara
Castro-de-Sousa, João Paulo
Martins, David
Prates Canelas, Joaquim
Reis, Pedro
Sampaio, António
Urbano, Helena
Kaku, Paulo
Nascimento, João
Marques-Neves, Carlos
Source :
Ophthalmic Research; 2020, Vol. 63 Issue 2, p114-121, 8p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: First-line treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) is usually with antivascular endothelial growth factor agents, followed by intravitreal corticosteroids as a second-line treatment option. Long-term corticosteroids may offer quality of life and effectiveness benefits over short-term implants. Objectives: To evaluate outcomes of patients with persistent or recurrent DME who switched from a short-term (dexamethasone) to a long-term (fluocinolone acetonide, FAc) corticosteroid intravitreal implant in a real-world setting. Methods: This is a retrospective study in 9 Portuguese centers. An FAc intravitreal implant was administered according to product labeling. Effectiveness outcomes were mean change in visual acuity (VA; ETDRS letters), central retinal thickness (CRT; µm), and macular volume (MV; mm<superscript>3</superscript>). The safety outcome was mean change in intraocular pressure (IOP; mm Hg). All were analyzed at months 1 and 3, and then quarterly until month 24 after implantation. Results: Forty-four eyes from 36 patients were analyzed. Mean duration of DME was 3.3 ± 1.9 years, and mean follow-up was 8 months. From baseline following FAc implantation, VA increased significantly at months 1 and 6 (mean +6.82 and +13.02 letters, respectively; p = 0.005), and last observation carried forward (LOCF; mean +8.3 letters; p = 0.002). CRT improved significantly at months 1 and 6 (mean –71.81 and –170.77 µm, respectively; p = 0.001), and LOCF (mean –121.46 µm; p = 0.001). MV was consistently, but not significantly, decreased from baseline to LOCF (mean –0.69 mm<superscript>3</superscript>; p = 0.062). The mean change in IOP was –0.25 and +0.88 mm Hg at months 1 and 6, respectively (p = 0.268), and +1.86 mm Hg at LOCF (p = 0.036). Increases were controlled with topical medication in most cases. Conclusions: The FAc intravitreal implant is effective in patients previously treated with short-term corticosteroid implants. Thus, after a suboptimal response to antiangiogenics or a short-term corticosteroid, a single FAc implant may be considered an effective and tolerable treatment that can improve long-term outcomes for patients with sight-threatening DME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00303747
Volume :
63
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Ophthalmic Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
142083530
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000503036