Academic Education of the Speech-Language Pathologist: A Comparative Analysis on Graduate Education in Two Low-Incidence Disorder Areas.

Background/Purpose: When working with a specialized population, it is necessary to have the appropriate clinical and academic training. However, many speech-language pathologists report being ill-prepared regarding best practice when evaluating and treating patients with low-incidence disorders, particularly cleft palate/craniofacial anomalies and fluency disorders. The purpose of this study was to compare differences in graduate speech-language pathology coursework in the United States across two low-incidence disorder areas: cleft/craniofacial anomalies and fluency disorders. Method: A review of the accredited graduate curricula offerings within these domains was completed. Information whether coursework in these areas was offered, if the course was taught as a full course or embedded within a related course, or whether the content was required or an elective, and if the course was taught by an expert was obtained. Results: Significant differences were present in the amount, quality, and type of course content offered for cleft/ craniofacial anomalies compared to fluency disorders. Only 72.83% of graduate speech-language pathologist programs offered content in cleft/craniofacial anomalies. Approximately one out of every four programs (27.17%) did not provide this content within the graduate curriculum. In contrast, content in fluency disorders was taught in 99.28% of graduate programs. Conclusion: Results demonstrate that graduate training in topics related to cleft/craniofacial anomalies is significantly limited, particularly in comparison to another low-incidence communication disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]