Back to Search
Start Over
Mild Cognitive Impairment and Receipt of Treatments for Acute Myocardial Infarction in Older Adults.
- Source :
- JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine; Jan2020, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p28-35, 8p, 3 Charts, 1 Graph
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- <bold>Background: </bold>Older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) should receive evidence-based treatments when indicated. Providers and patients may overestimate the risk of dementia in patients with MCI leading to potential under-treatment. However, the association between pre-existing MCI and receipt of evidence-based treatments is uncertain.<bold>Objective: </bold>To compare receipt of treatments for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between older adults with pre-existing MCI and cognitively normal patients.<bold>Design: </bold>Prospective study using data from the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study, Medicare, and American Hospital Association.<bold>Participants: </bold>Six hundred nine adults aged 65 or older hospitalized for AMI between 2000 and 2011 and followed through 2012 with pre-existing MCI (defined as modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status score of 7-11) and normal cognition (score of 12-27).<bold>Main Measures: </bold>Receipt of cardiac catheterization and coronary revascularization within 30 days and cardiac rehabilitation within 1 year of AMI hospitalization.<bold>Key Results: </bold>Among the survivors of AMI, 19.2% had pre-existing MCI (55.6% were women and 44.4% were male, with a mean [SD] age of 82.3 [7.5] years), and 80.8% had normal cognition (45.7% were women and 54.3% were male, with a mean age of 77.1 [7.1] years). Survivors of AMI with pre-existing MCI were significantly less likely than those with normal cognition to receive cardiac catheterization (50% vs 77%; P < 0.001), coronary revascularization (29% vs 63%; P < 0.001), and cardiac rehabilitation (9% vs 22%; P = 0.001) after AMI. After adjusting for patient and hospital factors, pre-existing MCI remained associated with lower use of cardiac catheterization (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89; P = 0.007) and coronary revascularization (aHR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81; P = .003), but not cardiac rehabilitation (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.49-2.07; P = 0.98).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Pre-existing MCI is associated with lower use of cardiac catheterization and coronary revascularization but not cardiac rehabilitation after AMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 08848734
- Volume :
- 35
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 141191588
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05155-8