Efficacy of Surfactant Combined with Peracetic Acid in Removing Listeria innocua from Fresh Apples.

Large amounts of water used in the apple packing process, the presence of organic matter, and difficult-to-clean equipment are vectors for contaminating apples with foodborne pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes. There is a need to develop new cleaning methods for fresh apples and evaluate their antimicrobial efficacy. A series of surfactants of different chemical properties (cationic lauric arginate [LAE], anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], and nonionic Tween 20 [T20]) alone and combined with peracetic acid (PAA) were evaluated for their efficiency in the removal of L. innocua, a surrogate of L. monocytogenes, from fresh apples. Whole fresh apples were inoculated with L. innocua (7 log CFU/mL) by a dipping method, dried, and subjected to wash treatments with selected cleaning solutions (water, PAA, PAA-LAE, PAA-SDS, and PAA-T20). The contact angle between the cleaning solutions and the surface of the apples was measured. The antimicrobial activity of the cleaning solutions and the efficacy of the cleaning treatment were evaluated by enumeration of L. innocua from treated apples and visualized by scanning electron microscopy. Stem bowl and calyx cavities of the apple harbored higher bacteria concentrations (∼4.82 log CFU per apple), compared with the equatorial section (∼2.66 log CFU per apple). Addition of 0.1% of selected surfactants led to a significant decrease in surface tension of cleaning solutions and allowed better spreading on the apple surface. Surfactants combined with PAA solution resulted in higher L. innocua reduction compared with PAA alone; however, their efficacy was limited. The most effective cleaning solution was PAA-T20, with reduction of approximately 2.2 log. Scanning electron microscopy imaging confirmed that most bacteria were harbored inside the surface irregularities. PAA alone and with surfactants caused damage and deformation of bacteria cells. Cleaning apples with PAA combined with surfactants may improve microbial safety in whole apples; however, the efficiency of the decontamination treatment can be reduced because of variations in apple morphology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]