Back to Search Start Over

Towards global relational theorizing: a dialogue between Sinophone and Anglophone scholarship on relationalism.

Authors :
Nordin, Astrid H. M.
Smith, Graham M.
Bunskoek, Raoul
Huang, Chiung-chiu
Hwang, Yih-jye (Jay)
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus
Kavalski, Emilian
Ling, L. H. M.
Martindale, Leigh
Nakamura, Mari
Nexon, Daniel
Premack, Laura
Qin, Yaqing
Shih, Chih-yu
Tyfield, David
Williams, Emma
Zalewski, Marysia
Source :
Cambridge Review of International Affairs; Oct2019, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p570-581, 12p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

What is 'relational theorizing' in International Relations and what can it offer? This article introduces a thematic section that responds to these questions by showing two things. First, relational theorizing is not a doctrine or a method, but a set of analyses that begin with relations rather than the putative essences of constitutively autonomous actors. Second, relational theorizing has emerged from different geo-linguistic traditions, and a relational approach to International Relations (IR) can offer the language and space for increased and productive engagement beyond Anglophone scholarship. This thematic section takes a significant step in this direction by staging a dialogue between Sinophone and Anglophone scholarship on relational IR theorizing. Such an engagement shows points of comparison and contrast, convergence and divergence. In this way, the essays presented here contribute to developing a more 'global' IR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09557571
Volume :
32
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Cambridge Review of International Affairs
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
139081953
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1643978