Back to Search Start Over

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors :
Siontis, George C M
Overtchouk, Pavel
Cahill, Thomas J
Modine, Thomas
Prendergast, Bernard
Praz, Fabien
Pilgrim, Thomas
Petrinic, Tatjana
Nikolakopoulou, Adriani
Salanti, Georgia
Søndergaard, Lars
Verma, Subodh
Jüni, Peter
Windecker, Stephan
Source :
European Heart Journal; 10/7/2019, Vol. 40 Issue 38, p3143-3153, 11p, 1 Chart, 7 Graphs
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Aims  Owing to new evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, we compared the collective safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) across the entire spectrum of surgical risk patients. Methods and results  The meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016037273). We identified RCTs comparing TAVI with SAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis reporting at different follow-up periods. We extracted trial, patient, intervention, and outcome characteristics following predefined criteria. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality up to 2 years for the main analysis. Seven trials that randomly assigned 8020 participants to TAVI (4014 patients) and SAVR (4006 patients) were included. The combined mean STS score in the TAVI arm was 9.4%, 5.1%, and 2.0% for high-, intermediate-, and low surgical risk trials, respectively. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was associated with a significant reduction of all-cause mortality compared to SAVR {hazard ratio [HR] 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–0.99], P  =   0.030}; an effect that was consistent across the entire spectrum of surgical risk (P -for-interaction = 0.410) and irrespective of type of transcatheter heart valve (THV) system (P -for-interaction = 0.674). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation resulted in lower risk of strokes [HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.68–0.98), P  =   0.028]. Surgical aortic valve replacement was associated with a lower risk of major vascular complications [HR 1.99 (95% CI 1.34–2.93), P  =   0.001] and permanent pacemaker implantations [HR 2.27 (95% CI 1.47–3.64), P  <   0.001] compared to TAVI. Conclusion  Compared with SAVR, TAVI is associated with reduction in all-cause mortality and stroke up to 2 years irrespective of baseline surgical risk and type of THV system. Open in new tab Download slide Open in new tab Download slide [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0195668X
Volume :
40
Issue :
38
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Heart Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
139059209
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz275