Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity following the use of three different instrumentation techniques: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors :
Adiguzel, Mehmet
Tufenkci, Pelin
Pamukcu, Ismail Ilker
Source :
Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects; Spring2019, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p133-140, 8p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative pain intensity following the root canal preparation carried out with XP-endo Shaper (XPS; FKG Dentaire SA, La Chauxde-Fonds, Switzerland), iRace (iRC; FKG Dentaire SA) and Reciproc Blue (REC Blue; VDW, Munich, Germany) files. Methods. Mandibular molar teeth with asymtomatic necrotic pulps in 69 patients were randomly divided into three groups (n=23). The root canals were prepared using XPS, iRC or REC Blue instruments and obturated using the lateral condensation technique. The patients were asked to record their pain intensity at 24-, 48- and 72-hour and 1-week postoperative intervals on VAS. For intolerable pain after the procedure, ibuprofen (400 mg) was prescribed. Data were analyzed using chi-squared, Friedman, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results. The postoperative pain gradually decreased during the study period in all the groups (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between iRC system and the two other systems at 12-, 24- 48-hour and 1-week intervals (P>0.05). When compared to XPS system, a higher level of postoperative pain was observed with REC Blue system at 24- and 48-hour intervals (P<0.05). Conclusion. The XPS group exhibited less postoperative pain than the REC Blue group at 24- and 48-hour intervals. iRC, XPS and REC Blue systems were found to be similar in terms of postoperative pain severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2008210X
Volume :
13
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138946670
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.021