Back to Search Start Over

"Get Ready and Empowered About Treatment" (GREAT) Study: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Activation in Persons Living with HIV.

Authors :
Carroll, Jennifer K.
Tobin, Jonathan N.
Luque, Amneris
Farah, Subrina
Sanders, Mechelle
Cassells, Andrea
Fine, Steven M.
Cross, Wendi
Boyd, Michele
Holder, Tameir
Thomas, Marie
Overa, Cleo Clarize
Fiscella, Kevin
Source :
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine; Sep2019, Vol. 34 Issue 9, p1782-1789, 8p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Little is known about strategies to improve patient activation, particularly among persons living with HIV (PLWH).<bold>Objective: </bold>To assess the impact of a group intervention and individual coaching on patient activation for PLWH.<bold>Design: </bold>Pragmatic randomized controlled trial.<bold>Sites: </bold>Eight practices in New York and two in New Jersey serving PLWH.<bold>Participants: </bold>Three hundred sixty PLWH who received care at participating practices and had at least limited English proficiency and basic literacy.<bold>Intervention: </bold>Six 90-min group training sessions covering use of an ePersonal Health Record loaded onto a handheld mobile device and a single 20-30 min individual pre-visit coaching session.<bold>Main Measures: </bold>The primary outcome was change in Patient Activation Measure (PAM). Secondary outcomes were changes in eHealth literacy (eHEALS), Decision Self-efficacy (DSES), Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS), health (SF-12), receipt of HIV-related care, and change in HIV viral load (VL).<bold>Key Results: </bold>The intervention group showed significantly greater improvement than the control group in the primary outcome, the PAM (difference 2.82: 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-5.32). Effects were largest among participants with lowest quartile PAM at baseline (pā€‰<ā€‰0.05). The intervention doubled the odds of improving one level on the PAM (odds ratio 1.96; 95% CI 1.16-3.31). The intervention group also had significantly greater improvement in eHEALS (difference 2.67: 95% CI 1.38-3.9) and PICS (1.27: 95% CI 0.41-2.13) than the control group. Intervention effects were similar by race/ethnicity and low education with the exception of eHealth literacy where effects were stronger for minority participants. No statistically significant effects were observed for decision self-efficacy, health status, adherence, receipt of HIV relevant care, or HIV viral load.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The patient activation intervention modestly improved several domains related to patient empowerment; effects on patient activation were largest among those with the lowest levels of baseline patient activation.<bold>Trial Registration: </bold>This study is registered at Clinical Trials.Gov (NCT02165735). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08848734
Volume :
34
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138297975
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05102-7