Back to Search Start Over

Patient experience feedback in UK hospitals: What types are available and what are their potential roles in quality improvement (QI)?

Authors :
Marsh, Claire
Peacock, Rosemary
Sheard, Laura
Hughes, Lesley
Lawton, Rebecca
Source :
Health Expectations; Jun2019, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p317-326, 10p, 3 Charts
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background & objectives: The comparative uses of different types of patient experience (PE) feedback as data within quality improvement (QI) are poorly understood. This paper reviews what types are currently available and categorizes them by their characteristics in order to better understand their roles in QI. Methods: A scoping review of types of feedback currently available to hospital staff in the UK was undertaken. This comprised academic database searches for "measures of PE outcomes" (2000‐2016), and grey literature and websites for all types of "PE feedback" potentially available (2005‐2016). Through an iterative consensus process, we developed a list of characteristics and used this to present categories of similar types. Main results: The scoping review returned 37 feedback types. A list of 12 characteristics was developed and applied, enabling identification of 4 categories that help understand potential use within QI—(1) Hospital‐initiated (validated) quantitative surveys: for example the NHS Adult Inpatient Survey; (2) Patient‐initiated qualitative feedback: for example complaints or twitter comments; (3) Hospital‐initiated qualitative feedback: for example Experience Based Co‐Design; (4) Other: for example Friends & Family Test. Of those routinely collected, few elicit "ready‐to‐use" data and those that do elicit data most suitable for measuring accountability, not for informing ward‐based improvement. Guidance does exist for linking collection of feedback to QI for some feedback types in Category 3 but these types  are not routinely used. Conclusion: If feedback is to be used more frequently within QI, more attention must be paid to obtaining and making available the most appropriate types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13696513
Volume :
22
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Health Expectations
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
136749637
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12885