Back to Search Start Over

The conservation status assessment of Natura 2000 forest habitats in Europe: capabilities, potentials and challenges of national forest inventories data.

Authors :
Alberdi, Iciar
Nunes, Leónia
Kovac, Marko
Bonheme, Ingrid
Cañellas, Isabel
Rego, Francisco Castro
Dias, Susana
Duarte, Inês
Notarangelo, Monica
Rizzo, Maria
Gasparini, Patrizia
Source :
Annals of Forest Science (BioMed Central); Jun2019, Vol. 76 Issue 2, pN.PAG-N.PAG, 1p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Key message: There is a need to improve the consistency of international information concerning the conservation status assessment of the species and habitat types in the Natura 2000 reports. National Forest Inventories could contribute towards a more objective and harmonised assessment although their use shows some challenges as low precision for rare or small area habitats. Recommendations for a set of 12 structural and functional indicators are provided. Context: There are differences among Member States as regards applying conservation status assessment and priorities according to the Directive on the conservation of natural habitats (Habitats Directive). Aims: This paper aims to analyse the consistency as regards forest habitat types reporting and the use and suitability of National Forest Inventories (NFIs) to assess their conservation status, as well as to provide recommendations for harmonised assessments through NFIs. Methods: A survey was carried out concerning the use of NFI data to report within the commitments of the Habitat Directive. The survey covered 13 European countries, accounting for 62% of forest habitat area. Additionally, case studies were carried out in four countries. Results: The identification of forest habitat types and the set of quantitative and/or qualitative indicators differ between countries. The use of NFI data is being considered in seven countries and it is expected to increase for the 2013–2018 reporting period. The main challenges reported of use of NFI data are related to the habitat identification and their mapping, and the monitoring frequency, design and costs (i.e. rare or small area habitats). Conclusion: It is necessary to improve the comparability of the conservation status assessments between countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
12864560
Volume :
76
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Annals of Forest Science (BioMed Central)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
136523777
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0820-4