Clinical algorithms for the screening of pregnant women for STDs in Libreville, Gabon: which alternatives?

<bold>Objective: </bold>Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) remain one of the major public health problems in the developing world. To implement a systematic screening of STDs among pregnant women in Libreville, Gabon, a preliminary cross sectional study on STD prevalence and risk factors was performed in antenatal clinics. A score, integrating risk factors and elementary clinical signs for the screening of STDs, showed higher performances compared with hierarchical algorithms. The prospective validation of this score based on six criteria (risk factors and simple clinical signs) was done in 1994-5. The sensitivity (76.7%), compared with results from other studies, was acceptable for diagnosing cervical infection (Neisseria gonorrhoeae and/or Chlamydia trachomatis) but the specificity was low (50.6%). In addition, the diagnostic values for diagnosing vaginal infection (Trichomonas vaginalis and/or Candida albicans) were poor. We then proposed to evaluate an alternative flowchart for the screening of cervical and vaginal infections.<bold>Methods: </bold>In this study, 646 pregnant women were enrolled. Each woman was interviewed and examined by a physician and then was subjected to reference laboratory examinations. An algorithm in two steps, combining a risk assessment score at the beginning of a hierarchical process, followed by a second step more specifically applied to a limited number of women, was developed and evaluated.<bold>Results: </bold>The prevalence rate was 11.3% for cervical infection and 39.5% for vaginal infection. The first step of the algorithm, applied to all pregnant women, is based on four criteria (age, marital status, dyspareunia, coloured vaginal discharge). It allows classification of the women into three classes: high, low, and intermediate risk of cervical infection. Only the patients with intermediate risk were submitted to further investigations including speculum and microscopic examination, and subsequently chlamydial antigen detection. This flowchart was 83.6% and 81.2% sensitive and 63.4% and 62.7% specific for predicting cervical infection and vaginal infection, respectively.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Similar strategies using simple rapid tests for chlamydial and gonococcal infection would certainly constitute a good diagnostic tool. This theoretical model needs to be evaluated prospectively, not only to confirm their diagnostic value but also to evaluate their feasibility, reliability and acceptability, as well as their cost effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]