Back to Search Start Over

National surveys of UK and Italian neonatal units highlighted significant differences in the use of non-invasive respiratory support.

Authors :
Bresesti, Ilia
Zivanovic, Sanja
Ives, Kevin Nicolas
Lista, Gianluca
Roehr, Charles Christoph
Source :
Acta Paediatrica; May2019, Vol. 108 Issue 5, p865-869, 5p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

<bold>Aim: </bold>This study compared how non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) was provided in neonatal units in Italy and the UK.<bold>Methods: </bold>An NRS questionnaire was sent to tertiary neonatal centres, identified by national societies, from November 2015 to May 2016.<bold>Results: </bold>Responses were received from 49/57 (86%) UK units and 103/115 (90%) Italian units. NRS was started in the delivery room by 61% of UK units and 85% of Italian units. In neonatal intensive care units, 33% of UK units used nasal high-flow therapy (HFT) as primary support, compared to 3% in Italy. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was used in 57% of UK units and 90% of Italian units. The commonest starting flow rate on nasal HFT for term and preterm infants was 6 L/min in the UK, while Italian units mainly used this flow for term infants. In the UK, 67% of units decreased nasal HFT by 1 L/min per day. In Italy, infants on nasal CPAP were weaned by 1 cm H2 O per day in 39% of units.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The way that NRS was managed for very preterm infants differed between the UK and Italy, reflecting a lack of evidence on optimal NRS and the use of local protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08035253
Volume :
108
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Acta Paediatrica
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
135843814
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14611