Back to Search
Start Over
Large care gaps in primary care management of asthma: a longitudinal practice audit.
- Source :
- BMJ Open; Jan2019, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p1-10, 10p
- Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Objectives Care gaps in asthma may be highly prevalent but are poorly characterised. We sought to prospectively measure adherence to key evidence-based adult asthma practices in primary care, and predictors of these behaviours. Design One-year prospective cohort study employing an electronic chart audit. Setting Three family health teams (two academic, one community-based) in Ontario, Canada. Participants 884 patients (72.1% female; 46.0±17.5 years old) (4199 total visits; 4.8±4.8 visits/patient) assigned to 23 physicians (65% female; practising for 10.0±8.6 years). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the proportion of visits during which practitioners assessed asthma control according to symptom-based criteria. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of: patients who had asthma control assessed at least once; visits during which a controller medication was initiated or escalated; and patients who received a written asthma action plan. Behavioural predictors were established a priori and tested in a multivariable model. Results Primary outcome: Providers assessed asthma control in 4.9% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing assessment included clinic site (p=0.019) and presenting symptom, with providers assessing control more often during visits for asthma symptoms (35.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (18.8%) relative to other visits (1.6%) (p<0.01). Secondary outcomes: Providers escalated controller therapy in 3.3% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing escalation included clinic site, presenting symptom and prior objective asthma diagnosis. Escalation occurred more frequently during visits for asthma symptoms (21.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (11.9%) relative to other visits (1.5%) (p<0.01) and in patients without a prior objective asthma diagnosis (3.5%) relative to those with (1.3%) (p=0.025). No asthma action plans were delivered. Conclusions Major gaps in evidence-based asthma practice exist in primary care. Targeted knowledge translation interventions are required to address these gaps, and can be tailored by leveraging the identified behavioural predictors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20446055
- Volume :
- 9
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- BMJ Open
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 134475980
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022506