Back to Search Start Over

Large care gaps in primary care management of asthma: a longitudinal practice audit.

Authors :
Price, Courtney
Agarwal, Gina
Chan, David
Goel, Sanjeev
Kaplan, Alan G.
Boulet, Louis-Philippe
Mamdani, Muhammad M.
Straus, Sharon E.
Lebovic, Gerald
Gupta, Samir
Source :
BMJ Open; Jan2019, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p1-10, 10p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objectives Care gaps in asthma may be highly prevalent but are poorly characterised. We sought to prospectively measure adherence to key evidence-based adult asthma practices in primary care, and predictors of these behaviours. Design One-year prospective cohort study employing an electronic chart audit. Setting Three family health teams (two academic, one community-based) in Ontario, Canada. Participants 884 patients (72.1% female; 46.0±17.5 years old) (4199 total visits; 4.8±4.8 visits/patient) assigned to 23 physicians (65% female; practising for 10.0±8.6 years). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the proportion of visits during which practitioners assessed asthma control according to symptom-based criteria. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of: patients who had asthma control assessed at least once; visits during which a controller medication was initiated or escalated; and patients who received a written asthma action plan. Behavioural predictors were established a priori and tested in a multivariable model. Results Primary outcome: Providers assessed asthma control in 4.9% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing assessment included clinic site (p=0.019) and presenting symptom, with providers assessing control more often during visits for asthma symptoms (35.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (18.8%) relative to other visits (1.6%) (p<0.01). Secondary outcomes: Providers escalated controller therapy in 3.3% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing escalation included clinic site, presenting symptom and prior objective asthma diagnosis. Escalation occurred more frequently during visits for asthma symptoms (21.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (11.9%) relative to other visits (1.5%) (p<0.01) and in patients without a prior objective asthma diagnosis (3.5%) relative to those with (1.3%) (p=0.025). No asthma action plans were delivered. Conclusions Major gaps in evidence-based asthma practice exist in primary care. Targeted knowledge translation interventions are required to address these gaps, and can be tailored by leveraging the identified behavioural predictors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
9
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMJ Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
134475980
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022506