Back to Search Start Over

Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance.

Authors :
France, Emma F
Cunningham, Maggie
Ring, Nicola
Uny, Isabelle
Duncan, Edward A S
Jepson, Ruth G
Maxwell, Margaret
Roberts, Rachel J
Turley, Ruth L
Booth, Andrew
Britten, Nicky
Flemming, Kate
Gallagher, Ian
Garside, Ruth
Hannes, Karin
Lewin, Simon
Noblit, George W
Pope, Catherine
Thomas, James
Vanstone, Meredith
Source :
BMC Medical Research Methodology; 1/31/2019, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p25-25, 1p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

<bold>Aims: </bold>The aim of this study was to provide guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta-ethnography reporting.<bold>Background: </bold>Evidence-based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people's experiences and associated social processes. Meta-ethnography is a rigorous seven-phase qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, developed by Noblit and Hare. Meta-ethnography is used widely in health research, but reporting is often poor quality and this discourages trust in and use of its findings. Meta-ethnography reporting guidance is needed to improve reporting quality.<bold>Design: </bold>The eMERGe study used a rigorous mixed-methods design and evidence-based methods to develop the novel reporting guidance and explanatory notes.<bold>Methods: </bold>The study, conducted from 2015 to 2017, comprised of: (1) a methodological systematic review of guidance for meta-ethnography conduct and reporting; (2) a review and audit of published meta-ethnographies to identify good practice principles; (3) international, multidisciplinary consensus-building processes to agree guidance content; (4) innovative development of the guidance and explanatory notes.<bold>Findings: </bold>Recommendations and good practice for all seven phases of meta-ethnography conduct and reporting were newly identified leading to 19 reporting criteria and accompanying detailed guidance.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The bespoke eMERGe Reporting Guidance, which incorporates new methodological developments and advances the methodology, can help researchers to report the important aspects of meta-ethnography. Use of the guidance should raise reporting quality. Better reporting could make assessments of confidence in the findings more robust and increase use of meta-ethnography outputs to improve practice, policy, and service user outcomes in health and other fields. This is the first tailored reporting guideline for meta-ethnography. This article is being simultaneously published in the following journals: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Psycho-oncology, Review of Education, and BMC Medical Research Methodology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712288
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
134420119
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0