Back to Search Start Over

Defensive caesarean section: A reality and a recommended health care improvement for Romanian obstetrics.

Authors :
Ionescu, Cringu Antoniu
Dimitriu, Mihai
Poenaru, Elena
Bănacu, Mihai
Furău, Gheorghe Otto
Navolan, Dan
Ples, Liana
Source :
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice; Feb2019, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p111-116, 6p, 1 Chart
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Rationale: Defensive caesarean section (CS) has become one of the most common medical procedure worldwide. Additionally, performing CS in accordance with the patient's choice is an appropriate professional practice. Aims and Objective: This paper reports a prospective, observational, multicenter study to quantify the use of this type of practice that is performed by obstetricians to avoid medico‐legal complaints and decrease the frequency of malpractice litigations. Methods: We interviewed 73 obstetricians from three distinct units of obstetrics and gynaecology, to assess their opinion regarding defensive caesarean delivery and caesarean delivery performed upon maternal request. We conducted an opinion‐based survey using questionnaires based on nine, close‐ended questions. Results: Out of 73 respondents, 51 (69.9%) stated that they perform defensive CS; 63 (86.3%) declared that their choice of birth delivery is influenced by the risk of being accused of malpractice; 60 (82.2%) indicated that it is normal for the patient to be able to decide on the type of delivery; and 63 (86.3%) declared that they consult their patients regarding their delivery preferences. We found statistically significant differences between the respondents who declare that they perform defensive CS (69.9%) and those who said that they are influenced by the risk of malpractice when they choose the method of delivery for their patients (86.3%) (P < .001; McNemar Test). Conclusions: The results of our study indicate that defensive caesarean section is a widespread practice among obstetrics practitioners in Romania. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13561294
Volume :
25
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
134052866
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13025