Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of Cardiac Lead Perforation: Comparison Among Chest Radiography, Transthoracic Echocardiography and Electrocardiography-gated Contrast-enhanced Cardiac CT.

Authors :
Zhang, Xiang
Zheng, Chushan
Wang, Peiwei
Wang, Dongye
Huang, Boshui
Li, Guozhao
Hu, Huijun
Yang, Zehong
Duan, Xiaohui
Zheng, Shaoxin
Liu, Pinming
Wang, Jingfeng
Shen, Jun
Source :
European Radiology; Feb2019, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p963-974, 12p, 5 Diagrams, 4 Charts, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

<bold>Objectives: </bold>Cardiac lead perforation is a rare but potentially life-threatening event. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performances of chest radiography, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and electrocardiography (ECG)-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT in the assessment of cardiac lead perforation.<bold>Methods: </bold>This retrospective study was approved by the ethics review board of Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital at Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, China), and the need to obtain informed consent was waived. Between May 2010 and Oct 2017, 52 patients were clinically suspected to have a cardiac lead perforation and received chest radiography, TTE and ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT. Among them, 13 patients were identified as having cardiac lead perforation. The diagnostic performances of these three modalities were evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves using a composite reference standard of surgical and electrophysiological results and clinical follow-up. The areas under ROCs (AUROCs) were compared with the McNemar test.<bold>Results: </bold>The accuracies of chest radiography, TTE and ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT imaging for the diagnosis of cardiac lead perforation were 73.1%, 82.7% and 98.1%, respectively. ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT had a higher AUROC than chest radiography (p < 0.001) and TTE (p < 0.001).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT is superior to both chest radiography and TTE imaging for the assessment of cardiac lead perforation.<bold>Key Points: </bold>• ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT has an accuracy of 98.1% in the diagnosis of cardiac lead perforation. • The AUROC of ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT is higher than those of chest radiography and TTE imaging. • ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT imaging has better diagnostic performance than both chest radiography and TTE imaging for the assessment of cardiac lead perforation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09387994
Volume :
29
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
133695332
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5633-6