Electrically guided versus imaging-guided implant of the left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial (ElectroCRT).

MLA

Stephansen, Charlotte, et al. “Electrically Guided versus Imaging-Guided Implant of the Left Ventricular Lead in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Study Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (ElectroCRT).” Trials, vol. 19, no. 1, Nov. 2018, p. N.PAG. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2930-y.

APA

Stephansen, C., Sommer, A., Kronborg, M. B., Jensen, J. M., Bouchelouche, K., & Nielsen, J. C. (2018). Electrically guided versus imaging-guided implant of the left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial (ElectroCRT). Trials, 19(1), N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2930-y

Chicago

Stephansen, Charlotte, Anders Sommer, Mads Brix Kronborg, Jesper Møller Jensen, Kirsten Bouchelouche, and Jens Cosedis Nielsen. 2018. “Electrically Guided versus Imaging-Guided Implant of the Left Ventricular Lead in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Study Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (ElectroCRT).” Trials 19 (1): N.PAG. doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2930-y.