Surveillance magnetic resonance imaging for isolated optic pathway gliomas: is gadolinium necessary?

<bold>Background: </bold>Pediatric optic pathway gliomas are typically indolent but have a variable clinical course. Treatment is dictated by symptoms and changes on contrast-enhanced MRI examinations. Gadolinium retention in children has motivated parsimonious use of gadolinium-based contrast agents.<bold>Objectives: </bold>To determine surveillance MR factors that motivate changes in tumor-directed therapies and extrapolate cost-efficacy of a non-contrast follow-up protocol.<bold>Materials and Methods: </bold>Using an imaging database search we identified children with isolated optic pathway gliomas and ≥3 follow-up contrast-enhanced MRIs. We reviewed medical records and imaging for: (1) coincident changes on contrast-enhanced MRI and tumor-directed therapy, (2) demographics and duration of follow-up, (3) motivations for intervention, (4) assessment of gadolinium-based contrast agents' utility and (5) health care utilization data. We assessed cost impact in terms of relative value unit (RVU) burden.<bold>Results: </bold>We included 17 neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and 21 non-NF1 patients who underwent a median 16.9 and 24.3 cumulative contrast-enhanced MR exams over 7.7 years and 8.1 years of follow-up, respectively. Eight children (one with NF1) had intervention based on contrast-enhanced MR findings alone. For these eight, increased tumor size was the only common feature, and it was apparent on non-contrast T2 sequences. For the median patient, a non-contrast follow-up protocol could result in 15.9 (NF1) and 23.3 (non-NF1) fewer gadolinium-based contrast agent administrations, and a 39% lower yearly RVU burden.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Pediatric patients with isolated optic pathway gliomas undergo a large number of routine contrast-enhanced MR follow-up exams. Gadolinium might not be needed for these exams to inform management decisions. Secondary benefits of a non-contrast follow-up protocol include decreased cost and risk to the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]