Back to Search
Start Over
Effects of vitamin D2 or D3 supplementation on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk among people at risk of type 2 diabetes: results of a randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial.
- Source :
- Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism; Apr2016, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p392-400, 9p
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Aims: To investigate the effect of short‐term vitamin D supplementation on cardiometabolic outcomes among individuals with an elevated risk of diabetes. Methods: In a double‐blind placebo‐controlled randomized trial, 340 adults who had an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes (non‐diabetic hyperglycaemia or positive diabetes risk score) were randomized to either placebo, 100 000 IU vitamin D<subscript>2</subscript> (ergocalciferol) or 100 000 IU vitamin D<subscript>3</subscript> (cholecalciferol), orally administered monthly for 4 months. The primary outcome was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) between baseline and 4 months, adjusted for baseline. Secondary outcomes included: blood pressure; lipid levels; apolipoprotein levels; C‐reactive protein levels; pulse wave velocity (PWV); anthropometric measures; and safety of the supplementation. Results: The mean [standard deviation (s.d.)] 25‐hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]<subscript>2</subscript> concentration increased from 5.2 (4.1) to 53.9 (18.5) nmol/l in the D<subscript>2</subscript> group, and the mean (s.d.) 25(OH)D<subscript>3</subscript> concentration increased from 45.8 (22.6) to 83.8 (22.7) nmol/l in the D<subscript>3</subscript> group. There was no effect of vitamin D supplementation on HbA1c: D<subscript>2</subscript> versus placebo: −0.05% [95% confidence interval (CI) −0.11, 0.02] or −0.51 mmol/mol (95% CI −1.16, 0.14; p = 0.13); D<subscript>3</subscript> versus placebo: 0.02% (95% CI −0.04, 0.08) or 0.19 mmol/mol (95% CI −0.46, 0.83; p = 0.57). There were no clinically meaningful effects on secondary outcomes, except PWV [D<subscript>2</subscript> versus placebo: −0.68 m/s (95% CI −1.31, −0.05); D<subscript>3</subscript> versus placebo −0.73 m/s (95% CI −1.42, −0.03)]. No important safety issues were identified. Conclusions: Short‐term supplementation with vitamin D<subscript>2</subscript> or D<subscript>3</subscript> had no effect on HbA1c. The modest reduction in PWV with both D<subscript>2</subscript> and D<subscript>3</subscript> relative to placebo suggests that vitamin D supplementation has a beneficial effect on arterial stiffness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14628902
- Volume :
- 18
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 130973147
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12625