Back to Search
Start Over
Association Between Oxygen Saturation Targeting and Death or Disability in Extremely Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration.
- Source :
- JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association; 6/5/2018, Vol. 319 Issue 21, p2190-2201, 12p
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- <bold>Importance: </bold>There are potential benefits and harms of hyperoxemia and hypoxemia for extremely preterm infants receiving more vs less supplemental oxygen.<bold>Objective: </bold>To compare the effects of different target ranges for oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (Spo2) on death or major morbidity.<bold>Design, Setting, and Participants: </bold>Prospectively planned meta-analysis of individual participant data from 5 randomized clinical trials (conducted from 2005-2014) enrolling infants born before 28 weeks' gestation.<bold>Exposures: </bold>Spo2 target range that was lower (85%-89%) vs higher (91%-95%).<bold>Main Outcomes and Measures: </bold>The primary outcome was a composite of death or major disability (bilateral blindness, deafness, cerebral palsy diagnosed as ≥2 level on the Gross Motor Function Classification System, or Bayley-III cognitive or language score <85) at a corrected age of 18 to 24 months. There were 16 secondary outcomes including the components of the primary outcome and other major morbidities.<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 4965 infants were randomized (2480 to the lower Spo2 target range and 2485 to the higher Spo2 range) and had a median gestational age of 26 weeks (interquartile range, 25-27 weeks) and a mean birth weight of 832 g (SD, 190 g). The primary outcome occurred in 1191 of 2228 infants (53.5%) in the lower Spo2 target group and 1150 of 2229 infants (51.6%) in the higher Spo2 target group (risk difference, 1.7% [95% CI, -1.3% to 4.6%]; relative risk [RR], 1.04 [95% CI, 0.98 to 1.09], P = .21). Of the 16 secondary outcomes, 11 were null, 2 significantly favored the lower Spo2 target group, and 3 significantly favored the higher Spo2 target group. Death occurred in 484 of 2433 infants (19.9%) in the lower Spo2 target group and 418 of 2440 infants (17.1%) in the higher Spo2 target group (risk difference, 2.8% [95% CI, 0.6% to 5.0%]; RR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.31], P = .01). Treatment for retinopathy of prematurity was administered to 220 of 2020 infants (10.9%) in the lower Spo2 target group and 308 of 2065 infants (14.9%) in the higher Spo2 target group (risk difference, -4.0% [95% CI, -6.1% to -2.0%]; RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.86], P < .001). Severe necrotizing enterocolitis occurred in 227 of 2464 infants (9.2%) in the lower Spo2 target group and 170 of 2465 infants (6.9%) in the higher Spo2 target group (risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI, 0.8% to 3.8%]; RR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.61], P = .003).<bold>Conclusions and Relevance: </bold>In this prospectively planned meta-analysis of individual participant data from extremely preterm infants, there was no significant difference between a lower Spo2 target range compared with a higher Spo2 target range on the primary composite outcome of death or major disability at a corrected age of 18 to 24 months. The lower Spo2 target range was associated with a higher risk of death and necrotizing enterocolitis, but a lower risk of retinopathy of prematurity treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- OXYGEN in the body
OXYGEN therapy for premature infants
NEONATAL necrotizing enterocolitis
HYPOXEMIA
META-analysis
BLINDNESS
CEREBRAL palsy
COMPARATIVE studies
DEAFNESS
DEVELOPMENTAL disabilities
PREMATURE infants
PREMATURE infant diseases
INFANT mortality
RESEARCH methodology
MEDICAL cooperation
OXIMETRY
OXYGEN
RESEARCH
RESEARCH funding
EVALUATION research
DISEASE incidence
KAPLAN-Meier estimator
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00987484
- Volume :
- 319
- Issue :
- 21
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 130012457
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.5725