Back to Search
Start Over
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
- Source :
- BMJ Quality & Safety; May2018, Vol. 27 Issue 5, p389-412, 24p, 1 Chart
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- This Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) article expands on the 26 items in the Standards for UNiversal reporting of Decision Aid Evaluations guidelines. The E&E provides a rationale for each item and includes examples for how each item has been reported in published papers evaluating patient decision aids. The E&E focuses on items key to reporting studies evaluating patient decision aids and is intended to be illustrative rather than restrictive. Authors and reviewers may wish to use the E&E broadly to inform structuring of patient decision aid evaluation reports, or use it as a reference to obtain details about how to report individual checklist items. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- ABSTRACTING
COMMUNICATION
CONCEPTUAL structures
CONFLICT of interests
CONSENSUS (Social sciences)
DECISION making
DELPHI method
DISCUSSION
ELECTRONIC publishing
GOAL (Psychology)
HEALTH systems agencies
LITERATURE
MEDICAL care
EVALUATION of medical care
MEDICAL personnel
MEDLINE
HEALTH outcome assessment
PATIENTS
PROBABILITY theory
PSYCHOMETRICS
QUALITY assurance
SOCIOECONOMIC factors
ACCESS to information
RESEARCH personnel
HUMAN research subjects
PATIENT decision making
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20445415
- Volume :
- 27
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 129957425
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006985