Back to Search Start Over

Repeatability and Reproducibility of Foveal Avascular Zone Area Measurement on Normal Eyes by Different Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Instruments.

Authors :
Pilotto, Elisabetta
Frizziero, Luisa
Crepaldi, Anna
Della Dora, Enrico
Deganello, Davide
Longhin, Evelyn
Convento, Enrica
Parrozzani, Raffaele
Midena, Edoardo
Source :
Ophthalmic Research; May2018, Vol. 59 Issue 4, p206-211, 6p
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

<bold><italic>Purpose:</italic></bold> To compare the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area measurements produced by different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). <bold><italic>Methods:</italic></bold> Healthy enrolled volunteers underwent OCTA using 2 different devices: Spectralis HRA+OCTA (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) and RS-3000 Advance (Nidek, Gamagori, Japan). Two graders measured FAZ in both superficial (SCP) and deep (DCP) retinal capillary plexuses. The SCP and DCP en face images were visualized automatically segmenting 2 separate slabs defined by the arbitrary segmentation lines created by the software of each OCT device. One grader repeated each measure twice. <bold><italic>Results:</italic></bold> Fifty-nine eyes were included. The mean FAZ was 0.33 ± 0.09 mm<superscript>2</superscript> at the SCP and 0.57 ± 0.17 mm<superscript>2</superscript> at the DCP measured with RS-3000 versus 0.30 ± 0.08 and 0.35 ± 0.08 mm<superscript>2</superscript>, respectively, measured with Spectralis. The measurements of the 2 devices were significantly different (<italic>p</italic> < 0.0001). The intraoperator agreement was excellent at the SCP (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC: 0.97 with Spectralis and 0.96 with RS-3000). At the DCP, it was good with Spectralis and fair with RS-3000 (ICC: 0.85 and 0.64, respectively). The interoperator agreement was excellent for Spectralis and good for RS-3000 at the SCP (ICC: 0.97 and 0.93, respectively). It was good at the DCP with both devices (ICC: 0.74 with RS-3000 and 0.81 with Spectralis). <bold><italic>Conclusions:</italic></bold> FAZ measurements obtained with different OCTA devices differ. These findings should be considered in follow-up studies of patients with retinal vascular diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00303747
Volume :
59
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Ophthalmic Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
129684015
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000485463