Back to Search
Start Over
The Strength of Long Ties (WITHDRAWN).
- Source :
- Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings; 2014, Vol. 2014 Issue 1, p1-1, 1p
- Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Granovetter's article on the strength of weak ties is one of the most widely cited in the social sciences in the past 40 years. Compared to a strong tie, a weak tie tends to span long network distances, thereby promoting access to otherwise unavailable information, greater social integration, and more rapid diffusion of innovations. However, the hypothesized length of weak ties has eluded empirical research, primarily due to the paucity of fine-grained network data at the population level. Using complete telephone communication data from the entire United Kingdom during a one-month period, we confirmed that the median volume of communication initially declines as the length of the tie increases from 2 to 4 steps, as Granovetter predicts. However, we discovered that the opposite holds for ties of length greater than 4, such that ties of length 10, while relatively few in number, are nearly as strong as ties of length 3. We examine three competing explanations: 1) nodes with few neighbors tend to invest heavily in their relations with one another but with a lower probability of having a neighbor in common; 2) the telephone is used both socially and instrumentally, such that the social use is consistent with Granovetter's thesis while the instrumental use is not; 3) social and spatial mobility causes social ties to be "stretched" across the network, with a probability of being broken that is greater for ties that are weak. We conclude that this selection effect is the explanation with the greatest empirical support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 21516561
- Volume :
- 2014
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings
- Publication Type :
- Conference
- Accession number :
- 128809649
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2014.17052abstract