Back to Search Start Over

Aggressive intravenous hydration with lactated Ringer's solution for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial.

Authors :
Chang-Hwan Park
Jong Jin Hyun
Jun Kyu Lee
Park, Chang-Hwan
Paik, Woo Hyun
Park, Eun Taek
Shim, Chan Sup
Lee, Tae Yoon
Kang, Changdon
Noh, Myung Hwan
Yi, Sun Youn
Lee, Jong Kyun
Hyun, Jong Jin
Lee, Jun Kyu
Woo Hyun Paik
Eun Taek Park
Chan Sup Shim
Tae Yoon Lee
Changdon Kang
Myung Hwan Noh
Source :
Endoscopy; 2018, Vol. 50 Issue 4, p378-385, 8p, 1 Chart, 3 Graphs
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS : The present study aimed to determine the type of intravenous hydration that is best suited to reducing the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis.<bold>Patients and Methods: </bold>In a prospective randomized multicenter trial, average-to-high risk patients who underwent first-time ERCP were randomly assigned to three groups (1:1:1) who received: aggressive intravenous hydration (3 mL/kg/h during ERCP, a 20-mL/kg bolus and 3 mL/kg/h for 8 hours after ERCP) with either lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) or normal saline solution (NSS), or standard intravenous hydration with LRS (1.5 mL/kg/h during and for 8 hours after ERCP). The primary end point was post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP).<bold>Results: </bold>395 patients were enrolled, and 385 completed the protocols. The three groups showed no significant differences in demographic characteristics. There was a significant difference in the intention-to-treat (ITT) PEP rate between the aggressive LRS group (3.0 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.1 % - 5.9 %; 4 /132), the aggressive NSS group (6.7 %, 95 %CI 2.5 % - 10.9 %; 9 /134) and the standard LRS group (11.6 %, 95 %CI 6.1 % - 17.2 %; 15 /129; P = 0.03). In the two-group comparisons, the ITT PEP rate was significantly lower for the aggressive LRS group than for the standard LRS group (relative risk [RR] 0.26, 95 %CI 0.08 - 0.76; P = 0.008). There was no significant difference in the ITT PEP rate between the aggressive NSS group and the standard LRS group (RR 0.57, 95 %CI 0.26 - 1.27; P = 0.17).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Aggressive hydration with LRS is the best approach to intravenous hydration for the prevention of PEP in average-to-high risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0013726X
Volume :
50
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Endoscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
128719167
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-122386