Back to Search Start Over

Phase I/II study of mocetinostat in combination with gemcitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and other advanced solid tumors.

Authors :
Chan, Emily
Chiorean, E. Gabriela
O’Dwyer, Peter J.
Gabrail, Nashat Y.
Alcindor, Thierry
Potvin, Diane
Chao, Richard
Hurwitz, Herbert
O'Dwyer, Peter J
Source :
Cancer Chemotherapy & Pharmacology; Feb2018, Vol. 81 Issue 2, p355-364, 10p
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

<bold>Purpose: </bold>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of mocetinostat (a Class I/IV HDAC inhibitor) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors, including pancreatic cancer.<bold>Methods: </bold>In this open-label, non-randomized Phase I/II study (NCT00372437) sequential cohorts of patients with solid tumors received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, day 1 of three consecutive weeks, 4-week cycles) and oral mocetinostat [50-110 mg, three times per week (TIW)]. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) was determined based on dose-limiting toxicities in Cycle 1 (Phase I study). The MTD/RP2D was further evaluated in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (Phase II study) using a two-stage design. The Phase II primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR).<bold>Results: </bold>Forty-eight patients were enrolled into the Phase I (n = 25) and Phase II (n = 23) studies. In the Phase I study, the MTD/RP2D was mocetinostat 90 mg TIW + gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 81% of all patients, the most frequent being fatigue (38%) and thrombocytopenia (19%). The ORR was 11% in the Phase I study (n = 2 patients with pancreatic cancer, responses lasting for 16.8 and 4.0 months, respectively). As no responses were seen in the Phase II cohort, the study was terminated.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Mocetinostat TIW in combination with gemcitabine was associated with significant toxicities in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The level of clinical activity of this treatment combination was not considered high enough to merit further testing in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03445704
Volume :
81
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Cancer Chemotherapy & Pharmacology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
127474650
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3494-3