Back to Search Start Over

Effect of Oral Capsule- vs Colonoscopy-Delivered Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors :
Kao, Dina
Roach, Brandi
Silva, Marisela
Beck, Paul
Rioux, Kevin
Kaplan, Gilaad G.
Hsiu-Ju Chang
Coward, Stephanie
Goodman, Karen J.
Huiping Xu
Madsen, Karen
Mason, Andrew
Gane Ka-Shu Wong
Jovel, Juan
Patterson, Jordan
Louie, Thomas
Chang, Hsiu-Ju
Xu, Huiping
Wong, Gane Ka-Shu
Source :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association; 11/28/2017, Vol. 318 Issue 20, p1985-1993, 9p, 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

<bold>Importance: </bold>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective in preventing recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI). However, it is not known whether clinical efficacy differs by route of delivery.<bold>Objective: </bold>To determine whether FMT by oral capsule is noninferior to colonoscopy delivery in efficacy.<bold>Design, Setting, and Participants: </bold>Noninferiority, unblinded, randomized trial conducted in 3 academic centers in Alberta, Canada. A total of 116 adult patients with RCDI were enrolled between October 2014 and September 2016, with follow-up to December 2016. The noninferiority margin was 15%.<bold>Interventions: </bold>Participants were randomly assigned to FMT by capsule or by colonoscopy at a 1:1 ratio.<bold>Main Outcomes and Measures: </bold>The primary outcome was the proportion of patients without RCDI 12 weeks after FMT. Secondary outcomes included (1) serious and minor adverse events, (2) changes in quality of life by the 36-Item Short Form Survey on a scale of 0 (worst possible quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), and (3) patient perception on a scale of 1 (not at all unpleasant) to 10 (extremely unpleasant) and satisfaction on a scale of 1 (best) to 10 (worst).<bold>Results: </bold>Among 116 patients randomized (mean [SD] age, 58 [19] years; 79 women [68%]), 105 (91%) completed the trial, with 57 patients randomized to the capsule group and 59 to the colonoscopy group. In per-protocol analysis, prevention of RCDI after a single treatment was achieved in 96.2% in both the capsule group (51/53) and the colonoscopy group (50/52) (difference, 0%; 1-sided 95% CI, -6.1% to infinity; Pā€‰<ā€‰.001), meeting the criterion for noninferiority. One patient in each group died of underlying cardiopulmonary illness unrelated to FMT. Rates of minor adverse events were 5.4% for the capsule group vs 12.5% for the colonoscopy group. There was no significant between-group difference in improvement in quality of life. A significantly greater proportion of participants receiving capsules rated their experience as "not at all unpleasant" (66% vs 44%; difference, 22% [95% CI, 3%-40%]; Pā€‰=ā€‰.01).<bold>Conclusions and Relevance: </bold>Among adults with RCDI, FMT via oral capsules was not inferior to delivery by colonoscopy for preventing recurrent infection over 12 weeks. Treatment with oral capsules may be an effective approach to treating RCDI.<bold>Trial Registration: </bold>clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02254811. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00987484
Volume :
318
Issue :
20
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
126498505
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.17077