Cite
Analysis of categorical moderators in mixed-effects meta-analysis: Consequences of using pooled versus separate estimates of the residual between-studies variances.
MLA
Rubio, Aparicio, María, et al. “Analysis of Categorical Moderators in Mixed-Effects Meta-Analysis: Consequences of Using Pooled versus Separate Estimates of the Residual between-Studies Variances.” British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, vol. 70, no. 3, Nov. 2017, pp. 439–56. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12092.
APA
Rubio, A. M., Sánchez, M. J., López, L. J. A., Botella, J., & Marín, M. F. (2017). Analysis of categorical moderators in mixed-effects meta-analysis: Consequences of using pooled versus separate estimates of the residual between-studies variances. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 70(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12092
Chicago
Rubio, Aparicio, María, Meca, Julio Sánchez, López, José Antonio López, Juan Botella, and Martínez, Fulgencio Marín. 2017. “Analysis of Categorical Moderators in Mixed-Effects Meta-Analysis: Consequences of Using Pooled versus Separate Estimates of the Residual between-Studies Variances.” British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology 70 (3): 439–56. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12092.