Back to Search Start Over

Mechanisms of the Sea–Air CO2 Flux Seasonal Cycle biases in CMIP5 Earth Systems Models in the Southern Ocean.

Authors :
Precious Mongwe, N.
Vichi, Marcello
Monteiro, Pedro M. S.
Source :
Biogeosciences Discussions; 2017, p1-34, 34p
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

The Southern Ocean forms a key component of the global carbon cycle. Recent studies, however, show that CMIP5 Earth System Models (ESM) disagree on the representation of the seasonal cycle of the CO<subscript>2</subscript> flux (FCO<subscript>2</subscript>) and compare poorly to observations in the Southern Ocean. This model-observations bias has important implications on the ability of ESMs to predict century scale CO<subscript>2</subscript> sink and related climate feedbacks. In this study, we used a specialized diagnostic analysis on 10 CMIP5 models in the Southern Ocean to discriminate the role of the major drivers, namely the temperature control and the concentration of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC). Our analysis shows that the FCO<subscript>2</subscript> biases in CMIP5 models cluster in two major groups. Group A models (MPI-ESM-MR, NorESM2 and HadGEM-ES) are characterized by exaggerated primary production such that biologically driven DIC changes mainly regulate the seasonal cycle of FCO<subscript>2</subscript>. Group-B (CMCC-CESM, GFDL-ESM2M, IPSL-CM5A-MR, MRI-ESM, CanESM2, CNRS-CERFACS) overestimates the role of temperature and thus the change in CO<subscript>2</subscript> solubility becomes a dominant driver of FCO<subscript>2</subscript> variability. While CMIP5 models mostly show a singular dominant influence of these two extremes, observations show a modest influence of both, with a dominance of DIC regulation. We found that CMIP5 models overestimate cooling and warming rates during autumn and spring with respect to observations. Because of this, the role of solubility is overestimated, particularly during these seasons (autumn and spring) in group B models, to the extent of contradicting the biological CO<subscript>2</subscript> uptake during spring. Group A does not show this solubility driven bias due to the overestimation of DIC draw down. This finding strongly implies that the inability of the CMIP5 ESMs to resolve CO<subscript>2</subscript> biological uptake during spring might be crucially related to the sensitivity of the pCO<subscript>2</subscript> to temperature in addition to underestimated biological CO<subscript>2</subscript> uptake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18106277
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Biogeosciences Discussions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
125472608
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2017-361