Cite
A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases.
MLA
Hikata, Tomohiro, et al. “A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases.” Clinical Spine Surgery, vol. 30, no. 8, Oct. 2017, pp. E1082–87. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000460.
APA
Hikata, T., Isogai, N., Shiono, Y., Funao, H., Okada, E., Fujita, N., Iwanami, A., Watanabe, K., Tsuji, T., Nakamura, M., Matsumoto, M., & Ishii, K. (2017). A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases. Clinical Spine Surgery, 30(8), E1082–E1087. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000460
Chicago
Hikata, Tomohiro, Norihiro Isogai, Yuta Shiono, Haruki Funao, Eijiro Okada, Nobuyuki Fujita, Akio Iwanami, et al. 2017. “A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases.” Clinical Spine Surgery 30 (8): E1082–87. doi:10.1097/bsd.0000000000000460.