Back to Search
Start Over
Do health professionals have a prototype concept of disease? The answer is no.
- Source :
- Philosophy, Ethics & Humanities in Medicine; 9/11/2017, Vol. 12, p1-7, 7p
- Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- <bold>Background: </bold>Health and disease are core concepts in health care and have attracted substantial interest and controversy. In recent and interesting contributions to the debate it has been argued that the challenges with the concept of disease can be resolved by a prototype concept of disease. As a robin is a more prototypical of a bird than a penguin, some diseases are more prototypical than others. If disease is a prototype concept, it would change nosology, but also health care and the study of health and disease. However, the statement that "disease is a prototype concept" forms an empirically testable hypothesis. Therefore, this study aims to test the hypothesis that health professionals have a prototype concept of disease.<bold>Methods: </bold>Two hundred twenty-three health care professionals in Norway were invited to participate in a survey where they were asked to rank a wide range of diseases according to how typical they considered them to be as diseases. Results were analysed with descriptive statistics.<bold>Results: </bold>The response rate was 90%. Lung cancer, leukemia, colon cancer, myocardial infarction, and AIDS are the diseases ranged to be most typical, while homosexuality, pregnancy, drapetomania, dissidence, and nostalgia are considered to be the least typical diseases. The results also show that the answers to how typical various diseases are vary greatly, even amongst a relatively homogenous group of health professionals.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>This study falsifies the hypothesis that disease is a prototype concept for health professionals. This has implications for the debate on core concepts for health care. If health professionals do not have a prototype concept of disease, it is unlikely that there is a prototype concept of disease in general. Consequently, nosologies should not be based on prototypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17475341
- Volume :
- 12
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Philosophy, Ethics & Humanities in Medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 125095932
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-017-0047-7