Metabolic markers for differentiation between renal allograft rejection and immunosuppressant toxicity in rat urine.

Introduction: Although current immunosuppressive protocols have dramatically improved 1-year survival of kidney transplants, there has been less progress in terms of long-term graft survival over the last two decades. The key to avoiding late graft loss is early diagnosis and differentiation between anti-allograft immune processes and immunosuppressant toxicity (IS-Tox). Modern bioanalytical technologies have opened new opportunities for the development of sensitive and specific diagnostic tools. There is an immediate need for biomarkers that are able to differentiate between renal allograft rejection and immunosuppressant toxicity. Objective: To test our hypothesis that changes of metabolite patterns in urine have the potential to serve as a non-invasive combinatorial biomarker that can differentiate between allograft immune reactions and IS-Tox. Methods: We used H-NMR spectroscopy and Luminex multiplexing for metabolic profiling of rat urine and the analysis of protein biomarkers in urine and plasma, respectively, to compare the effects of chronic allograft rejection in a Fisher-to-Lewis rat transplant model with IS-Tox induced by cyclosporine, tacrolimus and/or sirolimus in Lewis rats. Results: Our results showed that, while IS-Tox caused changes in metabolite patterns that are typically associated with proximal tubule damage, rejection caused more profuse changes not specifically focused on a particular kidney region. Moreover, metabolite pattern changes were more sensitive than changes in protein markers that were evident only during the later stages of rejection. Conclusion: The present study provides first proof-of-concept that longitudinal monitoring of urine metabolite markers has the potential to differentiate between early renal allograft rejection and immunosuppressant nephrotoxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]