Back to Search Start Over

Comparative Analysis of the Gut Microbiota Composition between Captive and Wild Forest Musk Deer.

Authors :
Yimeng Li
Xiaolong Hu
Shuang Yang
Juntong Zhou
Tianxiang Zhang
Lei Qi
Xiaoning Sun
Mengyuan Fan
Shanghua Xu
Muha Cha
Meishan Zhang
Shaobi Lin
Shuqiang Liu
Defu Hu
Source :
Frontiers in Microbiology; 9/5/2017, p1-10, 10p
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

The large and complex gut microbiota in animals has profound effects on feed utilization and metabolism. Currently, gastrointestinal diseases due to dysregulated gut microbiota are considered important factors that limit growth of the captive forest musk deer population. Compared with captive forest musk deer, wild forest musk deer have a wider feeding range with no dietary limitations, and their gut microbiota are in a relatively natural state. However, no reports have compared the gut microbiota between wild and captive forest musk deer. To gain insight into the composition of gut microbiota in forest musk deer under different food-source conditions, we employed high-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing technology to investigate differences in the gut microbiota occurring between captive and wild forest musk deer. Both captive and wild forest musk deer showed similar microbiota at the phylum level, which consisted mainly of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, although significant differences were found in their relative abundances between both groups. α-Diversity results showed that no significant differences occurred in the microbiota between both groups, while β-diversity results showed that significant differences did occur in their microbiota compositions. In summary, our results provide important information for improving feed preparation for captive forest musk deer and implementing projects where captive forest musk deer are released into the wild. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1664302X
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Frontiers in Microbiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
125014698
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01705