Back to Search Start Over

FULFIL Trial: Once-Daily Triple Therapy for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors :
Lipson, David A.
Barnacle, Helen
Birk, Ruby
Brealey, Noushin
Locantore, Nicholas
Lomas, David A.
Ludwig-Sengpiel, Andrea
Mohindra, Rajat
Tabberer, Maggie
Chang-Qing Zhu
Pascoe, Steven J.
Zhu, Chang-Qing
Source :
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine; 8/15/2017, Vol. 196 Issue 4, p438-446, 9p, 4 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

<bold>Rationale: </bold>Randomized data comparing triple therapy with dual inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are limited.<bold>Objectives: </bold>We compared the effects of once-daily triple therapy on lung function and health-related quality of life with twice-daily ICS/LABA therapy in patients with COPD.<bold>Methods: </bold>The FULFIL (Lung Function and Quality of Life Assessment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Closed Triple Therapy) trial was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study comparing 24 weeks of once-daily triple therapy (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol 100 μg/62.5 μg/25 μg; ELLIPTA inhaler) with twice-daily ICS/LABA therapy (budesonide/formoterol 400 μg/12 μg; Turbuhaler). A patient subgroup remained on blinded treatment for up to 52 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were change from baseline in trough FEV1 and in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at Week 24.<bold>Measurements and Main Results: </bold>In the intent-to-treat population (n = 1,810) at Week 24 for triple therapy (n = 911) and ICS/LABA therapy (n = 899), mean changes from baseline in FEV1 were 142 ml (95% confidence interval [CI], 126 to 158) and -29 ml (95% CI, -46 to -13), respectively, and mean changes from baseline in SGRQ scores were -6.6 units (95% CI, -7.4 to -5.7) and -4.3 units (95% CI, -5.2 to -3.4), respectively. For both endpoints, the between-group differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant reduction in moderate/severe exacerbation rate with triple therapy versus dual ICS/LABA therapy (35% reduction; 95% CI, 14-51; P = 0.002). The safety profile of triple therapy reflected the known profiles of the components.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>These results support the benefits of single-inhaler triple therapy compared with ICS/LABA therapy in patients with advanced COPD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02345161). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1073449X
Volume :
196
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
124668387
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201703-0449OC