Back to Search Start Over

Update: Interim Guidance for Health Care Providers Caring for Pregnant Women with Possible Zika Virus Exposure - United States (Including U.S. Territories), July 2017.

Authors :
Oduyebo, Titilope
Polen, Kara D.
Walke, Henry T.
Reagan-Steiner, Sarah
Lathrop, Eva
Rabe, Ingrid B.
Kuhnert-Tallman, Wendi L.
Martin, Stacey W.
Walker, Allison T.
Gregory, Christopher J.
Ades, Edwin W.
Carroll, Darin S.
Rivera, Maria
Perez-Padilla, Janice
Gould, Carolyn
Nemhauser, Jeffrey B.
Beard, C. Ben
Harcourt, Jennifer L.
Viens, Laura
Johansson, Michael
Source :
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report; 7/28/2017, Vol. 66 Issue 29, p781-793, 13p
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

CDC has updated the interim guidance for U.S. health care providers caring for pregnant women with possible Zika virus exposure in response to 1) declining prevalence of Zika virus disease in the World Health Organization's Region of the Americas (Americas) and 2) emerging evidence indicating prolonged detection of Zika virus immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies. Zika virus cases were first reported in the Americas during 2015-2016; however, the incidence of Zika virus disease has since declined. As the prevalence of Zika virus disease declines, the likelihood of false-positive test results increases. In addition, emerging epidemiologic and laboratory data indicate that, as is the case with other flaviviruses, Zika virus IgM antibodies can persist beyond 12 weeks after infection. Therefore, IgM test results cannot always reliably distinguish between an infection that occurred during the current pregnancy and one that occurred before the current pregnancy, particularly for women with possible Zika virus exposure before the current pregnancy. These limitations should be considered when counseling pregnant women about the risks and benefits of testing for Zika virus infection during pregnancy. This updated guidance emphasizes a shared decision-making model for testing and screening pregnant women, one in which patients and providers work together to make decisions about testing and care plans based on patient preferences and values, clinical judgment, and a balanced assessment of risks and expected outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01492195
Volume :
66
Issue :
29
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
124385913
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6629e1