Back to Search Start Over

Tumour heterogeneity poses a significant challenge to cancer biomarker research.

Authors :
Cyll, Karolina
Ersvær, Elin
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
Pradhan, Manohar
Kildal, Wanja
Avranden Kjær, Marte
Kleppe, Andreas
Hveem, Tarjei S
Carlsen, Birgitte
Gill, Silje
Löffeler, Sven
Haug, Erik Skaaheim
Wæhre, Håkon
Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
Danielsen, Håvard E
Ersvær, Elin
Avranden Kjær, Marte
Löffeler, Sven
Wæhre, Håkon
Danielsen, Håvard E
Source :
British Journal of Cancer; 7/25/2017, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p367-375, 9p, 2 Diagrams, 3 Charts, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>The high degree of genomic diversity in cancer represents a challenge for identifying objective prognostic markers. We aimed to examine the extent of tumour heterogeneity and its effect on the evaluation of a selected prognostic marker using prostate cancer as a model.<bold>Methods: </bold>We assessed Gleason Score (GS), DNA ploidy status and phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) expression in radical prostatectomy specimens (RP) from 304 patients followed for a median of 10 years (interquartile range 6-12). GS was assessed for every tumour-containing block and DNA ploidy for a median of four samples for each RP. In a subgroup of 40 patients we assessed DNA ploidy and PTEN status in every tumour-containing block. In 102 patients assigned to active surveillance (AS), GS and DNA ploidy were studied in needle biopsies.<bold>Results: </bold>Extensive heterogeneity was observed for GS (89% of the patients) and DNA ploidy (40% of the patients) in the cohort, and DNA ploidy (60% of the patients) and PTEN expression (75% of the patients) in the subgroup. DNA ploidy was a significant prognostic marker when heterogeneity was taken into consideration. In the AS cohort we found heterogeneity in GS (24%) and in DNA ploidy (25%) specimens.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Multi-sample analysis should be performed to support clinical treatment decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00070920
Volume :
117
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
British Journal of Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
124298555
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.171