Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of the recommendations of the AAPM TG-51 and TG-51 addendum reference dosimetry protocols.

Authors :
McCaw, Travis J.
Hwang, Min‐Sig
Jang, Si Young
Huq, M. Saiful
Source :
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics; Jul2017, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p140-143, 4p
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

This work quantified differences between recommendations of the TG-51 and TG-51 addendum reference dosimetry protocols. Reference dosimetry was performed for flattened photon beams with nominal energies of 6, 10, 15, and 23 MV, as well as flattening-filter free ( FFF) beam energies of 6 and 10 MV, following the recommendations of both the TG-51 and TG-51 addendum protocols using both a Farmer<superscript>®</superscript> ionization chamber and a scanning ionization chamber with calibration coefficients traceable to absorbed dose-to-water ( D<subscript>w</subscript>) standards. Differences in D<subscript>w</subscript> determined by the two protocols were 0.1%-0.3% for beam energies with a flattening filter, and up to 0.2% and 0.8% for FFF beams measured with the scanning and Farmer<superscript>®</superscript> ionization chambers, respectively, due to k<subscript>Q</subscript> determination, volume-averaging correction, and collimator jaw setting. Combined uncertainty was between 0.91% and 1.2% ( k = 1), varying by protocol and detector. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15269914
Volume :
18
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
123928699
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12110