Back to Search Start Over

Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals.

Authors :
Høstgaard, Anna Marie Balling
Bertelsen, Pernille
Nøhr, Christian
Source :
BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making; 4/20/2017, Vol. 17, p1-15, 15p, 1 Diagram, 1 Chart
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Information and communication sources in the healthcare sector are replaced with new eHealth technologies. This has led to problems arising from the lack of awareness of the importance of end-user involvement in eHealth development and of the difficulties caused by using traditional summative evaluation methods. The Constructive eHealth evaluation method (CeHEM) provides a solution to these problems by offering an evaluation framework for supporting and facilitating end-user involvement during all phases of eHealth development. The aim of this paper is to support this process by sharing experiences of the eHealth evaluation method used in the introduction of electronic health records (EHR) in the North Denmark Region of Denmark. It is the first time the fully developed method and the experiences on using the CeHEM in all five phases of a full lifecycle framework is presented.<bold>Methods: </bold>A case study evaluation of the EHR development process in the North Denmark Region was conducted from 2004 to 2010. The population consisted of clinicians, IT professionals, administrators, and vendors. The study involved 4 hospitals in the region. Data were collected using questionnaires, observations, interviews, and insight gathered from relevant documents.<bold>Results: </bold>The evaluation showed a need for a) Early involvement of clinicians, b) The best possible representation of clinicians, and c) Workload reduction for those involved. The consequences of not providing this were a lack of ownership of decisions and negative attitudes towards the clinical benefits related to these decisions. Further, the result disclosed that by following the above recommendations, and by providing feedback to the 4 actor groups, the physicians' involvement was improved. As a result they took ownership of decisions and gained a positive attitude to the clinical benefits.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The CeHEM has proven successful in formative evaluation of EHR development and can point at important issues that need to be taken care of by management. The method provides a framework that takes care of feedback and learning during eHealth development. It can thus support successful eHealth development in a broader context while building on a well-known success factor: end-user involvement in eHealth development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14726947
Volume :
17
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
122656490
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0444-2