Back to Search Start Over

Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of the 'Families for Health' programme to reduce obesity in children.

Authors :
Robertson, Wendy
Fleming, Joanna
Kamal, Atiya
Hamborg, Thomas
Khan, Kamran A.
Griffiths, Frances
Brown, Sarah Stewart
Stallard, Nigel
Petrou, Stavros
Simkiss, Douglas
Harrison, Elizabeth
Sung Wook Kim
Thorogood, Margaret
Stewart-Brown, Sarah
Kim, Sung Wook
Source :
Archives of Disease in Childhood; May2017, Vol. 102 Issue 5, p416-426, 11p, 1 Diagram, 6 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>Evaluating effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 'Families for Health V2' (FFH) compared with usual care (UC).<bold>Design: </bold>Multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) (investigators blinded, families unblinded) and economic evaluation. Stratified randomisation by family; target of 120 families.<bold>Setting: </bold>Three National Health Service Primary Care Trusts in West Midlands, England.<bold>Participants: </bold>Overweight or obese (≥91st or ≥98th centile body mass index (BMI)) children aged 6-11 years and their parents/carers, recruited March 2012-February 2014.<bold>Interventions: </bold>FFH; a 10-week community-based family programme addressing parenting, lifestyle change and social and emotional development. UC; usual support for childhood obesity at each site.<bold>Main Outcome Measures: </bold>Primary outcomes were 12-months change in children's BMI z-score and incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained (QALY). Secondary outcomes included changes in children's physical activity, fruit and vegetable consumption and quality of life, parents' BMI and mental well-being, family eating/activity, parent-child relationships and parenting style.<bold>Results: </bold>115 families (128 children) were randomised to FFH (n=56) or UC (n=59). There was no significant difference in BMI z-score 12-months change (0.114, 95% CI -0.001 to 0.229, p=0.053; p=0.026 in favour of UC with missing value multiple imputation). One secondary outcome, change in children's waist z-score, was significantly different between groups in favour of UC (0.15, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.29). Economic evaluation showed that mean costs were significantly higher for FFH than UC (£998 vs £548, p<0.001). Mean incremental cost-effectiveness of FFH was estimated at £552 175 per QALY.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>FFH was neither effective nor cost-effective for the management of obesity compared with UC.<bold>Trial Registration Number: </bold>ISRCTN45032201. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00039888
Volume :
102
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
122572029
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311514