Back to Search
Start Over
Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of the 'Families for Health' programme to reduce obesity in children.
- Source :
- Archives of Disease in Childhood; May2017, Vol. 102 Issue 5, p416-426, 11p, 1 Diagram, 6 Charts, 2 Graphs
- Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- <bold>Objective: </bold>Evaluating effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 'Families for Health V2' (FFH) compared with usual care (UC).<bold>Design: </bold>Multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) (investigators blinded, families unblinded) and economic evaluation. Stratified randomisation by family; target of 120 families.<bold>Setting: </bold>Three National Health Service Primary Care Trusts in West Midlands, England.<bold>Participants: </bold>Overweight or obese (≥91st or ≥98th centile body mass index (BMI)) children aged 6-11 years and their parents/carers, recruited March 2012-February 2014.<bold>Interventions: </bold>FFH; a 10-week community-based family programme addressing parenting, lifestyle change and social and emotional development. UC; usual support for childhood obesity at each site.<bold>Main Outcome Measures: </bold>Primary outcomes were 12-months change in children's BMI z-score and incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained (QALY). Secondary outcomes included changes in children's physical activity, fruit and vegetable consumption and quality of life, parents' BMI and mental well-being, family eating/activity, parent-child relationships and parenting style.<bold>Results: </bold>115 families (128 children) were randomised to FFH (n=56) or UC (n=59). There was no significant difference in BMI z-score 12-months change (0.114, 95% CI -0.001 to 0.229, p=0.053; p=0.026 in favour of UC with missing value multiple imputation). One secondary outcome, change in children's waist z-score, was significantly different between groups in favour of UC (0.15, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.29). Economic evaluation showed that mean costs were significantly higher for FFH than UC (£998 vs £548, p<0.001). Mean incremental cost-effectiveness of FFH was estimated at £552 175 per QALY.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>FFH was neither effective nor cost-effective for the management of obesity compared with UC.<bold>Trial Registration Number: </bold>ISRCTN45032201. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- PUBLIC health
PREVENTION of obesity
RANDOMIZED controlled trials
PARENTING
CHILDREN'S health
GOVERNMENT policy
OBESITY
OBESITY treatment
ANTHROPOMETRY
CHILD health services
COMPARATIVE studies
COST effectiveness
DIET
FAMILY health
FOOD habits
HEALTH promotion
RESEARCH methodology
MEDICAL cooperation
HEALTH outcome assessment
PARENT-child relationships
QUALITY of life
RESEARCH
RESEARCH funding
SOCIAL classes
EVALUATION research
BODY mass index
LIFESTYLES
BLIND experiment
ECONOMICS
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00039888
- Volume :
- 102
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 122572029
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311514