Back to Search Start Over

Current and potential providers of blood pressure self-screening: a mixed methods study in Oxfordshire.

Authors :
Tompson, A. C.
Fleming, S. G.
Heneghan, C. J.
McManus, R. J.
Greenfield, S. M.
Hobbs, F. D. R.
Ward, A. M.
Source :
BMJ Open; 3/1/2017, Vol. 7, p1-8, 8p
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Objectives: To (1) establish the extent of opportunities for members of the public to check their own blood pressure (BP) outside of healthcare consultations (BP self-screening), (2) investigate the reasons for and against hosting such a service and (3) ascertain how BP self-screening data are used in primary care. Design: A mixed methods, cross-sectional study. Setting: Primary care and community locations in Oxfordshire, UK. Participants: 325 sites were surveyed to identify where and in what form BP self-screening services were available. 23 semistructured interviews were then completed with current and potential hosts of BP selfscreening services. Results: 18/82 (22%) general practices offered BP self-screening and 68/110 (62%) pharmacies offered professional-led BP screening. There was no evidence of permanent BP self-screening activities in other community settings. Healthcare professionals, managers, community workers and leaders were interviewed. Those in primary care generally felt that practice-based BP selfscreening was a beneficial activity that increased the attainment of performance targets although there was variation in its perceived usefulness for patient care. The pharmacists interviewed provided BP checking as a service to the community but were unable to develop self-screening services without a clear business plan. Among potential hosts, barriers to providing a BP self-screening service included a perceived lack of healthcare commissioner and public demand, and a weak--if any--link to their core objectives as an organisation. Conclusions: BP self-screening currently occurs in a minority of general practices. Any future development of community BP self-screening programmes will require (1) public promotion and (2) careful consideration of how best to support--and reward--the community hosts who currently perceive little if any benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMJ Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
122471943
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013938