Back to Search Start Over

Kidney function and appropriateness of device therapies in adults with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors :
Bansal, Nisha
Szpiro, Adam
Masoudi, Frederick
Greenlee, Robert T.
Smith, David H.
Magid, David J.
Gurwitz, Jerry H.
Reynolds, Kristi
Tabada, Grace H.
Sue Hee Sung
Dighe, Ashveena
Cassidy-Bushrow, Andrea
Garcia-Montilla, Romel
Hammill, Stephen
Hayes, John
Kadish, Alan
Sharma, Param
Varosy, Paul
Vidaillet, Humberto
Go, Alan S.
Source :
Heart; Apr2017, Vol. 103 Issue 7, p537-545, 9p, 2 Charts, 3 Graphs
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have higher risk of sudden cardiac death; however, they may not receive implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), in part due to higher risk of complications. We evaluated whether CKD is associated with greater risk of device-delivered shocks/antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapies among patients receiving a primary prevention ICD.<bold>Methods: </bold>We studied participants in the observational Cardiovascular Research Network Longitudinal Study of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Outcomes included all delivered shocks/ATPs therapies and type of shock/ATP therapies (inappropriate or appropriate, determined by physician adjudication) within the 3 years. We evaluated the associations between CKD and time to first device therapy, burden of device therapy, and inappropriate versus appropriate device therapy, adjusting for demographics, comorbidity, laboratory values and medication use.<bold>Results: </bold>Among 2161 participants, 1066 (49.3%) had CKD (eGFR 44±11 mL/min/1.73 m2) at ICD implantation. During mean of 2.26±0.89 years, 9.8% and 18.5% of participants had at least one inappropriate and appropriate shock/ATP therapies, respectively. CKD was not associated with time to first shock/ATP therapies (adjusted HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.05), overall burden of shock/ATP therapies (adjusted relative rate 0.93, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.17) or inappropriate versus appropriate shock/ATP therapies (adjusted relative risk 0.88, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.14) compared with not having CKD.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In adults receiving a primary prevention ICD, mild-to-moderate CKD was not associated with the timing, burden or appropriateness of subsequent device therapy. Potential concern for inappropriate ICD-delivered therapies should not preclude ICDs among eligible patients with CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13556037
Volume :
103
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Heart
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
121809153
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309842