Back to Search
Start Over
Substituting whole grains for refined grains in a 6-wk randomized trial favorably affects energy-balance metrics in healthy men and postmenopausal women.
- Source :
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition; 3/1/2017, Vol. 105 Issue 3, p589-599, 11p, 5 Charts, 4 Graphs
- Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Background: The effect of whole grains on the regulation of energy balance remains controversial. Objective: We aimed to determine the effects of substituting whole grains for refined grains, independent of body weight changes, on energy-metabolism metrics and glycemic control. Design: The study was a randomized, controlled, parallel-arm controlled-feeding trial that was conducted in 81 men and postmenopausal women [49 men and 32 women; age range: 40-65 y; body mass index (in kg/m<superscript>2</superscript>): <35.0]. After a 2-wk run-in period, participants were randomly assigned to consume 1 of 2 weight-maintenance diets for 6 wk. Diets differed in whole-grain and fiber contents [mean ± SDs: whole grain-rich diet: 207 ± 39 g whole grains plus 40 ± 5 g dietary fiber/d; refined grain-based diet: 0 g whole grains plus 21 ± 3 g dietary fiber/d] but were otherwise similar. Energy metabolism and body-composition metrics, appetite, markers of glycemic control, and gut microbiota were measured at 2 and 8 wk. Results: By design, body weight was maintained in both groups. Plasma alkylresorcinols, which are biomarkers of whole-grain intake, increased in the whole grain-rich diet group (WG) but not in the refined grain-based diet group (RG) (P-diet-by-time interaction < 0.0001). Beta ± SE changes (DWG compared with DRG) in the resting metabolic rate (RMR) (43 ± 25 kcal/d; P = 0.04), stool weight (76 ± 12 g/d; P < 0.0001), and stool energy content (57 ± 17 kcal/d; P = 0.003), but not in stool energy density, were higher in the WG.When combined, the favorable energetic effects in the WG translated into a 92-kcal/d (95% CI: 28, 156-kcal/d) higher net daily energy loss compared with that of the RG (P = 0.005). Prospective consumption (P = 0.07) and glycemia after an oral-glucose-tolerance test (P = 0.10) trended toward being lower in the WG than in the RG. When nonadherent participants were excluded, between-group differences in stool energy content and glucose tolerance increased, and between-group differences in the RMR and prospective consumption were not statistically significant. Conclusion: These findings suggest positive effects of whole grains on the RMR and stool energy excretion that favorably influence energy balance and may help explain epidemiologic associations between whole-grain consumption and reduced body weight and adiposity. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01902394. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- BLOOD sugar analysis
MICROBIOLOGY
FECES
GUT microbiome
FOOD habits
BODY composition
ANALYSIS of covariance
ANALYSIS of variance
ANTHROPOMETRY
APPETITE
BASAL metabolism
HUMAN microbiota
CALORIMETRY
CHI-squared test
CLINICAL trials
CONFIDENCE intervals
STATISTICAL correlation
DESIRE
ENERGY metabolism
GLUCOSE tolerance tests
GRAIN
PROBABILITY theory
QUESTIONNAIRES
REGRESSION analysis
RESEARCH funding
STATISTICAL sampling
STATISTICAL hypothesis testing
STATISTICS
STATISTICAL power analysis
DATA analysis
BODY mass index
RANDOMIZED controlled trials
VISUAL analog scale
REPEATED measures design
BLIND experiment
POSTMENOPAUSE
PHYSICAL activity
DATA analysis software
DESCRIPTIVE statistics
GLYCEMIC control
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00029165
- Volume :
- 105
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 121662129
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.139683