What Drives the Consequences of Intentional Misstatements? Evidence from Rating Analysts' Reactions.

This paper aims to identify the mechanisms through which intentional misstatements adversely affect firms by analyzing rating analysts' reaction to misstatements. In order to identify the mechanisms through which the misstatement affects firms' credit ratings, we analyze the content of rating reports. Rating analysts are concerned about seven different mechanisms. They are most concerned about misstatement-related violations of debt covenants that increase a firm's liquidity risk. We find that, subsequent to an intentional misstatement becoming publicly known, credit ratings of misreporting firms are adversely affected for up to seven years. The adverse impact of an intentional misstatement on a firm's credit rating is most pronounced in cases in which rating analysts mention concerns about misstatement-related violations of covenants. Our results suggest that these covenant violations are the most severe mechanism through which misstatements adversely affect firms' creditworthiness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]