Back to Search Start Over

Estimating the OncotypeDX score: validation of an inexpensive estimation tool.

Authors :
Eaton, Anne
Pesce, Catherine
Murphy, James
Stempel, Michelle
Patil, Sujata
Brogi, Edi
Hudis, Clifford
El-Tamer, Mahmoud
Source :
Breast Cancer Research & Treatment; Feb2017, Vol. 161 Issue 3, p435-441, 7p
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background: OncotypeDX, a multi-gene expression assay, has been incorporated into clinical practice as a prognostic and predictive tool. However, its use in resource-constrained international healthcare systems is limited. Here we develop and validate a simplified model using clinicopathologic criteria to predict OncotypeDX score. Methods: Patients with estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive and HER2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma for whom the OncotypeDX test was successfully performed between 09/2008 and 12/2011 were retrospectively identified. Tumor size, nuclear and histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, and ER and PR status were extracted from pathology reports. Data were split into a training dataset comprising women tested 09/2008-04/2011, and a validation dataset comprising women tested 04/2011-12/2011. Using the training dataset, linear regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with OncotypeDX score, and to create a simplified risk score and identify risk cutoffs. Results: Estrogen and progesterone receptors, tumor size, nuclear and histologic grades, and lymphovascular involvement were independently associated with OncotypeDX. The full model explained 39% of the variation in the test data, and the simplified risk score and cutoffs assigned 57% of patients in the test data to the correct risk category (OncotypeDX score <18, 18-30, >30). 41% of patients were predicted to have OncotypeDX score <18, of these 83, 16, and 2% had true scores of <18, 18-30, and >30, respectively. Conclusions: Awaiting an inexpensive test that is prognostic and predictive, our simplified tool allows clinicians to identify a fairly large group of patients (41%) with very low chance of having high-risk disease (2%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01676806
Volume :
161
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Breast Cancer Research & Treatment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
120771284
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4069-4