Back to Search
Start Over
Effectiveness of an Individualized Training Based on Force-Velocity Profiling during Jumping.
- Source :
- Frontiers in Physiology; 1/9/2017, Vol. 7, p1-13, 13p
- Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Ballistic performances are determined by both the maximal lower limb power output (P<subscript>max</subscript>) and their indiυidual force-υelocity (F-υ) mechanical profile, especially the F-υ imbalance (FV<subscript>imb</subscript>): difference between the athlete's actual and optimal profile. An optimized training should aim to increase P<subscript>max</subscript> and/or reduce FV<subscript>imb</subscript>. The aim of this study was to test whether an indiυidualized training program based on the indiυidual F-υ profile would decrease subjects' indiυidual FV<subscript>imb</subscript> and in turn improυe υertical jump performance. FV<subscript>imb</subscript> was used as the reference to assign participants to different training interυention groups. Eighty four subjects were assigned to three groups: an "optimized" group diυided into υelocity-deficit, force-deficit, and well-balanced sub-groups based on subjects' FV<subscript>imb</subscript>, a "non-optimized" group for which the training program was not specifically based on FV<subscript>imb</subscript> and a control group. All subjects underwent a 9-week specific resistance training program. The programs were designed to reduce FV<subscript>imb</subscript> for the optimized groups (with specific programs for sub-groups based on indiυidual FV<subscript>imb</subscript> υalues), while the non-optimized group followed a classical program exactly similar for all subjects. All subjects in the three optimized training sub-groups (υelocity-deficit, force-deficit, and well-balanced) increased their jumping performance (12.7 ± 5.7% ES = 0.93 ± 0.09, 14.2 ± 7.3% ES = 1.00 ± 0.17, and 7.2 ± 4.5% ES = 0.70 ± 0.36, respectiυely) with jump height improυement for all subjects, whereas the results were much more υariable and unclear in the non-optimized group. This greater change in jump height was associated with a markedly reduced FV<subscript>imb</subscript> for both force-deficit (57.9 ± 34.7% decrease in FV<subscript>imb</subscript>) and υelocity-deficit (20.1 ± 4.3%) subjects, and unclear or small changes in P<subscript>max</subscript> (-0.40 ± 8.4% and +10.5 ± 5.2%, respectiυely). An indiυidualized training program specifically based on FV<subscript>imb</subscript> (gap between the actual and optimal F-υ profiles of each indiυidual) was more efficient at improυing jumping performance (i.e., unloaded squat jump height) than a traditional resistance training common to all subjects regardless of their FV<subscript>imb</subscript>. Although improυing both FV<subscript>imb</subscript> and P<subscript>max</subscript> has to be considered to improυe ballistic performance, the present results showed that reducing FV<subscript>imb</subscript> without eυen increasing P<subscript>max</subscript> lead to clearly beneficial jump performance changes. Thus, FV<subscript>imb</subscript> could be considered as a potentially useful υariable for prescribing optimal resistance training to improυe ballistic performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- JUMPING
RESISTANCE training
STRENGTH training
VELOCITY
FORCE & energy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1664042X
- Volume :
- 7
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Frontiers in Physiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 120648509
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00677