Comparison of image recognition efficiency of Bayes, correlation, and modified Hopfield network algorithms.

The statistical estimates of the probability of correct recognition of the images, noisy reference by an additive handicap, for Bayes, correlation, and modified Hopfield network algorithms are compared. It is shown that, in the case of complete a priori probability concerning a handicap, the modified Hopfield network algorithm reaches the quality of the Bayes algorithm. At a deviation a priori probability on a handicap, the quality of the Bayes algorithm is worse than that of the modified Hopfield network algorithm. The correlation algorithm is worse than the modified Hopfield network algorithm, in general. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]