Back to Search Start Over

Similar biological activity in skin prick test for Oralair® (8200 BAU) and Grazax® (6200 BAU) reinforces effective SLIT dosing level.

Authors :
Larenas Linnemann, D. E. S.
Singh, J.
Rosario, N.
Esch, R.
Matta, J. J.
Maspero, J.
Michels, A.
Mösges, R.
Source :
Allergy; Dec2016, Vol. 71 Issue 12, p1782-1786, 5p, 1 Chart, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

In Europe, allergen extracts are standardized based on skin prick wheal size in 20-30 allergic subjects. To understand the biological activity of clinically effective Sublingual immunotherapy, we used this method to determine the biological activity of solution and tablet Timothy grass pollen ( TIM) extracts, compared to an FDA-approved extract (Reference) of 10 000 BAU/ml. Blinded, quadruplicate skin prick tests with concentrate and three serial half-log dilutions allowed the construction of a semilogarithmic regression line per extract. Bioequivalent allergy units ( BAU) values were obtained from the comparison with reference. Extracts and dilutions showed a neat linear dose response (all: R<superscript>2</superscript> > 0.98) in 33 rhinitis patients. Relative potencies: Staloral<superscript>®</superscript> 12 000 BAU/ml, Soluprick<superscript>®</superscript> 10 300 BAU/ml, Oralair<superscript>®</superscript> 8200 BAU, and Grazax<superscript>®</superscript> 6200 BAU. Even though all extract concentrates differed in wheal size ( P = 0.01-0.001), Grazax<superscript>®</superscript> producing a 25% smaller wheal size than Oralair<superscript>®</superscript>, and the biological activity of these clinically effective TIM tablets led in the same range (6200-8200 BAU; 0.92-1.23 cm<superscript>2</superscript>). SLIT dose-finding studies for other pollens might start with allergen extracts producing 1.1 cm<superscript>2</superscript> wheal surface. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01054538
Volume :
71
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Allergy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
119477252
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12998