Back to Search
Start Over
The challenges for scientific publishing, 60 years on.
- Source :
- Journal of Neurochemistry; Oct2016 Supplement, Vol. 139, p280-287, 8p
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- The most obvious difference in science publishing between 'then' and 'now' is the dramatic change in the communication of data and in their interpretation. The democratization of science via the Internet has brought not only benefits but also challenges to publishing including fraudulent behavior and plagiarism, data and statistics reporting standards, authorship confirmation and other issues which affect authors, readers, and publishers in different ways. The wide accessibility of data on a global scale permits acquisition and meta-analysis to mine for novel synergies, and has created a highly commercialized environment. As we illustrate here, identifying unacceptable practices leads to changes in the standards for data reporting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- SCIENCE publishing
NEUROCHEMISTRY
FALSIFICATION of data
PLAGIARISM
ETHICS
CORRUPTION
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00223042
- Volume :
- 139
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 119148124
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13550