Peer-reviewed and unbiased research, rather than 'sound science', should be used to evaluate endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

MLA

Trasande, Leonardo, et al. “Peer-Reviewed and Unbiased Research, Rather than ’Sound Science’, Should Be Used to Evaluate Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, vol. 70, no. 11, Nov. 2016, pp. 1051–56. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-207841.

APA

Trasande, L., Vandenberg, L. N., Bourguignon, J.-P., Peterson Myers, J., Slama, R., vom Saal, F., & Zoeller, R. T. (2016). Peer-reviewed and unbiased research, rather than ’sound science’, should be used to evaluate endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 70(11), 1051–1056. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-207841

Chicago

Trasande, Leonardo, Laura N. Vandenberg, Jean-Pierre Bourguignon, John Peterson Myers, Remy Slama, Frederick vom Saal, and Robert Thomas Zoeller. 2016. “Peer-Reviewed and Unbiased Research, Rather than ’Sound Science’, Should Be Used to Evaluate Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 70 (11): 1051–56. doi:10.1136/jech-2016-207841.